2017-04-04 ساعت 14:20
(2017-03-29 ساعت 18:53)Shishah نوشته: سلام دوستان
همسر من هم سيتيزن امريكا هستن و 12 سال اونجا زندگي كرده بودن و براي ازدواج اومدن ايران و حدود دو سالي كه كارمون طول كشيده (الان در مرحله AP هستم) تا الان در ايران زندگي كرديم. براي اقدام اوليه از هرجايي ميتونين مدارك رو ارسال كنين و منتظر بمونين. 2 ماه قبل از مصاحبه من همسرم رفتن امريكا و كار پيدا كردن و ماشين و اينترنت و خريد و بيمه و گواهينامه و تراكنش فراوان بانكي و ... ولي افيسر به محض اين كه ديد مدت كمي از رفتنش ميگزره نقص مدارك دمسايل زد و هيچ كدوم از مدارك رو هم قبول نكرد و گفت تراكنش و اينا كه از هرجايي ميتونه باشه و تنها كار و ماليات ملاكه كه اونها هم نشون ميده مدت كمي در امسال امريكا بوده.
يعني ميخام اطلاع داشته باشين كه اگر اين روش رو انتخاب ميكنين انتظار نقص مدارك رو هم داشته باشين كه البته با موندنشون در امريكا و كار و اينا قابل حل هست فقط ميتونه كمي پروسه رو طولاني تر كنه (و البته من همچنان راضي هستم كه اين روش رو انتخاب كردم و اين همه مدت دور نمونديم.)
در مورد روشي كه دوستمون گفتن من خيلي خيلي قبل از اقدام هم تحقيق كردم. تا جايي كه من ميدونم به هيچ عنوان همچين ويزايي وجود نداره. تنها راه ويزاي توريستي هست كه اونم وقتي ببينن شما همسر سيتيزن دارين احتمال اينكه بهتون بدن تقريبا صفره (من امتحان كردم) و راه ديگه ويزاي نامزدي هست كه پروسه كوتاه تري داره (حدود 1-1/5 سال) كه نبايد ازدواج كرده باشين و بعد برين در ظرف 90 روز در امريكا ازدواج كنين كه اون هم تقريبا همين پروسه و ريسكهاي خودش رو داره.
موفق باشيد
سلام
من هم در مورد روش دوم فقط شنیده بودم و اطلاع زیادی نداشتم.
ولی در مورد اینکه همسرتون اگه بتونن زود تر برن یا اصلا نرن و بخوان وقتی ویزای شما در اومد برین ، تو سایت USCIS دو حالت وجود داره. یکی اینکه شما تو سفارت علم کنید که همسرتون domicile هستند، که فقط یکی دو ماه در آمریکا بودن قبل از ورود شما اثبات نمیکنه که domicile باشن. (البته مواردی هم من دیدم که اینطوری اعلام کردن و آفیسر سخت نگرفته). حالت دیگه اینه که بگین که همسرتو domicile نبودن تو آمریکا ولی الان دوباره میخوان domicile بشن و این کارهارو انجام دادن. اینطوری برای آفیسر خیلی قابل قبول تر میشه و در حالت عادی باید ایرادی نداشته باشه.
USCIS and the State Department list several factors that may show an intention to reestablish domicile in the U.S.:
Accepting a job or “seeking employment” in the U.S.
Signing a lease, purchasing a residence, or making arrangements to stay in another’s home. (Just beginning a house search is not mentioned but may be relevant too).
Registering children in U.S. schools.
Opening a bank account or transferring funds to the U.S. or investing in the U.S.
Voting in U.S. elections.
Getting a U.S. driver’s license is not mentioned but the U.S. Consulate in Guangzhou has found it to be relevant in some cases.
This list of factors is not meant to be exclusive. A sponsor may have other relevant evidence of plans to reestablish domicile in the U.S.
In addition, evidence that you are severing similar ties abroad may bolster your claim that you are moving back to the U.S.
A sponsor’s stated intention to re-establish U.S. domicile must be judged by the consular officer to be credible. Credibility may be easier to establish in some cases than others. For example, if a spouse is immigrating, the officer may believe it’s natural for the sponsor to move to the U.S. to stay together. But a consular officer may doubt that a sponsor would necessarily move to the U.S. when a sibling or adult son or daughter immigrates. Where credibility is an issue, the officer may require more corroborating evidence. Here’s a sample request for additional evidence from a sponsor:
The petitioner must show that she/he spends a preponderance of time in the U.S. This time spent in the U.S. needs to be over a period of time. In other words, the petitioner must show that the petitioner is truly maintaining a residence in the United States, not just traveling for a couple of months at a time and then returning [abroad]. Although there is no time frame [required] to establish residence, it must be convincing evidence of continued ties to the United States and that the petitioner has, in fact, taken up residence in the United States. Evidence that the sponsor has established a domicile in the United States and is either physically residing there or intends to do so before or concurrently with the applicant includes, but is not limited to, the following: (1) opening a bank account; (2) transferring funds to the United States; (3) making investments in the United States; (4) seeking employment in the United States; (5) registering children in U.S. schools; (6) applying for a social security number; (7) voting in local, state or federal elections (8) leases, mortgages, utility bills, telephone bills, etc. established in the petitioner’s name. Provide a photo of the petitioner holding a current newspaper with the date clearly visible standing in front of a U.S. post office and color copies of all pages of the petitioner’s international passport[ ] with page numbers clearly visible.
[img]/Users/soroush/Desktop/Screen Shot 2017-04-04 at 14.15.14.png[/img]
CR1-K3
I-130 sent: 2016/08/05
NOA1: 2016/08/31
NOA2: 2017/03/22
NVC Received: 2017/03/27
NVC Case Number and Invoice ID Number: 2017/04/05
Interview in Ankara
Form DS-261: 2017/04/06
Send IV and AOS package: 2017/05/12
Case Complete: 2017/07/07
receive instruction and interview appointment letter: 2017/08/02
interview date: 2017/09/06
result: check list (lack of proof of domicile docs)
sending documents for proof of domicile: 2017/10/07
visa issuance: 2017/10/14
I-130 sent: 2016/08/05
NOA1: 2016/08/31
NOA2: 2017/03/22
NVC Received: 2017/03/27
NVC Case Number and Invoice ID Number: 2017/04/05
Interview in Ankara
Form DS-261: 2017/04/06
Send IV and AOS package: 2017/05/12
Case Complete: 2017/07/07
receive instruction and interview appointment letter: 2017/08/02
interview date: 2017/09/06
result: check list (lack of proof of domicile docs)
sending documents for proof of domicile: 2017/10/07
visa issuance: 2017/10/14